Snowpiercer (TV series)
PostPosted:Sat May 08, 2021 9:58 pm
I like the concept, but I have some serious problems.
I’ve only seen the first episode so far.
What I like: It’s a post-apocalyptic dystopian Caves of Steel ripoff that takes place on a an archeology/train instead of archeology/domed city.
What I don’t like:
It’s FILLED with exposition. The episode felt like a bit of an essay with a bit of a story wrapped into it. It blatantly feels like setup. I was hoping film and TV was getting away from these sorts of formulas with shows like Breaking Bad, Witcher, and Westworld, and films like Rogue One, Interstellar, and Bladerunner 2049, where you’re not really told what’s going on, you just kind of glean it from what’s happening. It’s the Hunger Games effect - rapid-fire.
Hunger Games felt like this to me: “this is happening, and this! “Watch out for tracker jackets!” “What are tracker jackers?” “They’re like hornets created by the grey suits.” “Grey suits?” “Scientist engineers working for the 1st district, the first district are the uppity-muppities.” “Now what are uppity muppities.” “The Jarl Herculean Master class.” “You mean rich people?” “Err, yeah!”—- I made most of that up, but you get the point. A lot of TV shows are starting to feel like this.
Problem #2 - every single damn interaction has such blatantly forced conflict. Randomly one of the characters decides to be an asshole - and this sort of interaction happened like 15 times in the episode. There is not one regular interaction. Considering how many hands this show is in, I’m not sure whose fault this is. But it’s a common thing in film and TV in the last few years. This is the Tarantino effect. The difference is Tarantino is essentially making comedy films; but the way it happens in films/TV these days reeks of Executive Producer editing, so I don’t blame the writers.
Overall, I the problematic stuff is easy to overlook given the premise is interesting, the characters are interesting, and everything about it seems promising.
I’ve only seen the first episode so far.
What I like: It’s a post-apocalyptic dystopian Caves of Steel ripoff that takes place on a an archeology/train instead of archeology/domed city.
What I don’t like:
It’s FILLED with exposition. The episode felt like a bit of an essay with a bit of a story wrapped into it. It blatantly feels like setup. I was hoping film and TV was getting away from these sorts of formulas with shows like Breaking Bad, Witcher, and Westworld, and films like Rogue One, Interstellar, and Bladerunner 2049, where you’re not really told what’s going on, you just kind of glean it from what’s happening. It’s the Hunger Games effect - rapid-fire.
Hunger Games felt like this to me: “this is happening, and this! “Watch out for tracker jackets!” “What are tracker jackers?” “They’re like hornets created by the grey suits.” “Grey suits?” “Scientist engineers working for the 1st district, the first district are the uppity-muppities.” “Now what are uppity muppities.” “The Jarl Herculean Master class.” “You mean rich people?” “Err, yeah!”—- I made most of that up, but you get the point. A lot of TV shows are starting to feel like this.
Problem #2 - every single damn interaction has such blatantly forced conflict. Randomly one of the characters decides to be an asshole - and this sort of interaction happened like 15 times in the episode. There is not one regular interaction. Considering how many hands this show is in, I’m not sure whose fault this is. But it’s a common thing in film and TV in the last few years. This is the Tarantino effect. The difference is Tarantino is essentially making comedy films; but the way it happens in films/TV these days reeks of Executive Producer editing, so I don’t blame the writers.
Overall, I the problematic stuff is easy to overlook given the premise is interesting, the characters are interesting, and everything about it seems promising.