The Shrine

<div style='font: 11pt "comic sans MS", Modern; text-align: left; '>The movie "Snatch" was brilliant. Makes "Pulp Fiction" pale in comparison with this three(or four) storied tale.</div>

<div style='font: 10pt "Arial bold", Modern; text-align: left; '>I thought it was an excellent British version of Pulp Fiction</div>

<div style='font: 9pt Arial, Modern; text-align: left; '>It's reheated "Lock, Stock, and Two Smoking Barrels" served up as fine cuisine. Good, but nowhere near the level of Pulp Fiction.</div>

<div style='font: 11pt "comic sans MS", Modern; text-align: left; '>Oh now way, mate! This eer ass mo' bollocks den dat fagget balls Pulp Fiction yer talkin 'bout.</div>

<div style='font: 9pt Arial, Modern; text-align: left; '>Whatever. Would you be saying the same if the characters didn't all have English accents?</div>

<div style='font: 9pt "times new roman", Modern; text-align: left; '>I think that's a perfectly valid reason to elevate a movie's ranking. And I'm being serious!</div>

<div style='font: 10pt Verdana, Tahoma, Modern; text-align: left; padding: 0% 10% 0% 10%; '>I gotta say Snatch is better than Pulp Fiction.</div>

<div style='font: 11pt "comic sans MS", Modern; text-align: left; '>Well....not movies like Boys in the Hood or New Jack City. I can't imagine them stopping their shootouts for tea time.</div>

<div style='font: 11pt "comic sans MS", Modern; text-align: left; '>Sine would have multiple orgasms with this movie. (You can't say "orgasm" and the movie "snatch" in the same sentence)</div>

<div style='font: 9pt Arial, Modern; text-align: left; '>It's a copy of a movie that copied Pulp Fiction, which is saying something. Unlike Pulp Fiction, it has no characters I could ever care about. The plot is mostly a series of coincidences. Not a bad movie, but not a particularly great one.</div>

<div style='font: 11pt "comic sans MS", Modern; text-align: left; '>"Ya lak dags?"</div>

<div style='font: 10pt Verdana, Tahoma, Modern; text-align: left; padding: 0% 10% 0% 10%; '>Blah blah blah. It was hilarious, fast, and a goddamned fun movie.</div>

<div style='font: 9pt Arial, Modern; text-align: left; '>Pulp Fiction was nominated for seven Academy Awards, including Best Picture, Best Director, and Best Screenplay Written Directly for the Screen (which it won). It is a genuinely original film. Snatch is not, a fact that no amount of funky camera work or English accents will alter. The only Academy Award it might get nominated for is Best Film Editing.

Don't think for a moment that I don't like Snatch, because I do. But let's not delude ourselves. Snatch was not, is not, and never will be considered on the same level as Pulp Fiction, not by film critics, not by mainstream movie-goers. In six months people will forget about it, just like they forgot about Lock, Stock, and Two Smoking Barrels. Maybe it will have a good run at the rental store, maybe not. One thing's for sure; it's not haute cuisine, and it won't ever achieve the legendary status of Pulp Fiction. Or, for that matter, Lock, Stock, and Two Smoking Barrels.</div>

<div style='font: 10pt Verdana, Tahoma, Modern; text-align: left; padding: 0% 10% 0% 10%; '>I really don't care, because I enjoyed Snatch more.</div>

<div style='font: 9pt Arial, Modern; text-align: left; '>Then I'll say no more.</div>

<div style='font: 9pt arial, Modern; text-align: left; '>Like The Limey!!!</div>

<div style='font: 9pt arial, Modern; text-align: justify; '>Oh sweet merciful mother of Jesus, that sucked. A lot.</div>