The Other Worlds Shrine

Your place for discussion about RPGs, gaming, music, movies, anime, computers, sports, and any other stuff we care to talk about... 

  • "While critics gave Hour 2 mixed reviews, moviegoers have showered it with grade-A reviews, according to CinemaScore, an online ticketing service."

  • Your favorite band sucks, and you have terrible taste in movies.
Your favorite band sucks, and you have terrible taste in movies.
 #46244  by G-man Joe
 Mon Aug 06, 2001 12:27 pm
<div style='font: 11pt "comic sans MS"; text-align: left; '>Duh.....when it comes to comedy, critics are almost always wrong. They hate Adam Sandler flicks, yet the movie goers are all over it. Rush Hour 2 got mixed reviews from critics? Heh....think about it. These of critics prefer artsy-fartsy films. You think their stiff upper lips would crack a smile at comedies like this? Heh...come on.</div>

 #46246  by Imakeholesinu
 Mon Aug 06, 2001 1:02 pm
<div style='font: 10pt Arial; text-align: left; '>Not to mention the femme fatals.....</div>

 #46250  by Stephen S.
 Mon Aug 06, 2001 4:23 pm
<div style='font: 9pt Arial; text-align: left; '>This populist notion that film critics are all wheezy practitioners of "artsy-fartsy elitism" is a knee-jerk response to any perceived assault on one's own tastes, and complete crap.</div>

 #46251  by G-man Joe
 Mon Aug 06, 2001 5:25 pm
<div style='font: 11pt "comic sans MS"; text-align: left; '>Yeah....the critics are right on about their reviews. Don't go see Rush Hour 2! DON'T! NOT WITHOUT THE CRITICS BLESSINGS! *chuckles at Stephen S*</div>

 #46252  by Kupek
 Mon Aug 06, 2001 5:47 pm
<div style='font: 10pt Verdana, Tahoma; text-align: left; padding: 0% 10% 0% 10%; '>I agree with that to a certain extent, but I still don't put much weight in what critics say. They watch movies for a LIVING. There's little question they're jaded.</div>

 #46254  by Zeus
 Mon Aug 06, 2001 6:03 pm
<div style='font: 10pt "Arial bold"; text-align: left; '>A movie doesn't have to be good to be enjoyable, but the critics simply cannot give a poorly made film a good review by their nature. There are lots of mindless films that are not particularly well made</div>

 #46255  by Zeus
 Mon Aug 06, 2001 6:04 pm
<div style='font: 10pt "Arial bold"; text-align: left; '>When was the last time you heard any "respectable" critic say "this is not a well-made film, but it's just so much fun, you have to go see it"?</div>

 #46257  by Zeus
 Mon Aug 06, 2001 6:09 pm
<div style='font: 10pt "Arial bold"; text-align: left; '>.......but are very, very enjoyable</div>

 #46261  by SineSwiper
 Mon Aug 06, 2001 8:16 pm
<div style='font: 11pt "EngraversGothic BT", "Copperplate Gothic Light"; text-align: left; '>When a critic gives a review of a movie that worse than what I thought of the previews, I think I have the right to call him a fucking idiot.</div>

 #46264  by Blotus
 Mon Aug 06, 2001 8:52 pm
<div style='font: 10pt "arial narrow"; text-align: left; padding: 0% 5% 0% 5%; '>Case in point: Planet of the Apes remake (although for that one I'd cut out the "very, very" and say its just enjoyable).</div>

 #46265  by Stephen S.
 Mon Aug 06, 2001 8:56 pm
<div style='font: 9pt Arial; text-align: left; '><b>Link:</b> <a href="http://www.suntimes.com/output/ebert1/l ... html">Tomb Raider</a>

No respectable critic would use such contradictory wording (an incompetent movie is hardly ever "fun"), but I can see your gist, and I can give you an example. Read this review of Tomb Raider by Roger Ebert and tell me what you think.</div>

 #46266  by Stephen S.
 Mon Aug 06, 2001 8:59 pm
<div style='font: 9pt Arial; text-align: left; '>I never said people shouldn't go and see Rush Hour 2 because of what some critics said, and you know it. Don't put nonsense into my mouth.</div>

 #46267  by Lee S.
 Mon Aug 06, 2001 9:06 pm
<div style='font: 9pt arial; text-align: justify; '>"Lara Croft is a major babe with a great set of ears." Oh, Ebert, you cornball, you.</div>

 #46271  by Stephen S.
 Mon Aug 06, 2001 9:10 pm
<div style='font: 9pt Arial; text-align: left; '>See? This proves professional critics can make asses of themselves as readily as any average moviegoer.</div>
 #46272  by SineSwiper
 Mon Aug 06, 2001 9:12 pm
<div style='font: 11pt "EngraversGothic BT", "Copperplate Gothic Light"; text-align: left; '>Let's say that a trailer scores X points in the comedy scale. That means that when I walk into a theatre, I know that it has at least X points. If a reviewer rates a movie with less than X points for the ENTIRE MOVIE, then I know that the comedy part of the movie was just fucking lost to him.

Now, stories are different, but with comedy, you basically have X amount of jokes. Besides, I loved the cameos with the original Rush Hour, when I saw the previews.</div>

 #46275  by SineSwiper
 Mon Aug 06, 2001 9:16 pm
<div style='font: 11pt "EngraversGothic BT", "Copperplate Gothic Light"; text-align: left; '>I haven't seen it, but I've haven't really heard on -why- it's bad. Anybody?</div>
 #46278  by Kupek
 Mon Aug 06, 2001 9:29 pm
<div style='font: 10pt Verdana, Tahoma; text-align: left; padding: 0% 10% 0% 10%; '>The worst movies can have the best trailers; if a trailer has a really funny scene (forget that they might splice it to actually be different than it is), often you'll see it over and over, dulling how funny it is when you finally see it, and then those two minutes might be the best parts of a 90 minute comedy.

Trailers are essentialy music videos with all the most exciting/funny/dramatic scenes from the movie as a backdrop. Trying to judge the quality of a movie by them is like trying to judge the quality of a book by it's blurb on the back.</div>

 #46280  by Kupek
 Mon Aug 06, 2001 9:37 pm
<div style='font: 10pt Verdana, Tahoma; text-align: left; padding: 0% 10% 0% 10%; '><b>Link:</b> <a href="http://www.penny-arcade.com/news.php3?d ... 1-06-25</a>

And here. (Hey, if you're going to read a "review," it might as well be enjoyable.)</div>

 #46283  by Crono
 Tue Aug 07, 2001 12:18 am
<div style='font: 12pt Arial; text-align: left; '>Yah, exactly. It's the kinda movie that you KNOW will leave you in stitches, especially if you're one of the many millions who saw the first one (and liked it).</div>

 #46285  by SineSwiper
 Tue Aug 07, 2001 8:04 am
<div style='font: 11pt "EngraversGothic BT", "Copperplate Gothic Light"; text-align: left; '>True, but at least that movie scores X points still.</div>

 #46287  by G-man Joe
 Tue Aug 07, 2001 10:14 am
<div style='font: 11pt "comic sans MS"; text-align: left; '>No. I wasn't quoting you. I was just pointing out that you seem to put more weight into what movie critics say than the movie goers.</div>

 #46288  by Kupek
 Tue Aug 07, 2001 10:22 am
<div style='font: 10pt Verdana, Tahoma; text-align: left; padding: 0% 10% 0% 10%; '>Not at all, like I said, I've seen many movies that were worse than the trailer.</div>

 #46292  by Tessian
 Tue Aug 07, 2001 1:35 pm
<div style='font: 11pt Dominion; text-align: left; '>only if you make a point not to think about it AT ALL once you leave the theatre</div>

 #46293  by S.Cody2
 Tue Aug 07, 2001 3:31 pm
<div style='font: 14pt Plakatbau; text-align: left; '>Missed the point. He's saying critics just get written off as spoilsports today regardless of what movies they're rejecting. It's almost a reflex by 'the (ubiquitous) public'.</div>

 #46297  by G-man Joe
 Tue Aug 07, 2001 5:36 pm
<div style='font: 11pt "comic sans MS"; text-align: left; '>I wonder what led people to that path.....hmmmm.....consistency on being off target perhaps? How many times have you heard your friends say "I don't listen to the critics"? Plenty, I'm sure. I got the point alright.</div>

 #46300  by Stephen S.
 Tue Aug 07, 2001 10:52 pm
<div style='font: 9pt Arial; text-align: left; '>You're painting all critics with the same brush. I'll use Rush Hour 2 as an example; it got MIXED reviews. That means some critics liked it, and others didn't. Critics, like any members of a profession, are of different minds and opinions. And still you keep lumping them all under "elitist snobs."</div>

 #46301  by G-man Joe
 Tue Aug 07, 2001 11:28 pm
<div style='font: 11pt "comic sans MS"; text-align: left; '>Now we're getting PC. Screw the critics, mmmkay? Sheesh....talk about elitist snobs. Gettin' PC wit me. hmph!</div>

 #46302  by Tessian
 Tue Aug 07, 2001 11:54 pm
<div style='font: 11pt Dominion; text-align: left; '>Saw it today,, Great movie! The best I've seen all summer.. the last out take was the best :)</div>

 #46303  by Stephen S.
 Wed Aug 08, 2001 12:04 am
<div style='font: 9pt Arial; text-align: left; '>Jesus Christ, G-Man. You don't even know what PC really means, do you? Why don't you consult a dictionary, and then tell me if my refusal to stereotype an entire profession is considered "PC." Mmmkay?</div>

 #46307  by S.Cody2
 Wed Aug 08, 2001 2:59 am
<div style='font: 14pt Plakatbau; text-align: left; '>My Ownage-o-meter is off the scale! Zounds!</div>

 #46314  by G-man Joe
 Wed Aug 08, 2001 9:37 am
<div style='font: 11pt "comic sans MS"; text-align: left; '>You righteous little PC person you. "Stephen S - defender of the race of movie critics!" if this was a movie, I'm sure it would get mixed reviews too.</div>

 #46318  by Blotus
 Wed Aug 08, 2001 11:38 am
<div style='font: 10pt "arial narrow"; text-align: left; padding: 0% 5% 0% 5%; '>Dork!</div>

 #46320  by Stephen S.
 Wed Aug 08, 2001 12:55 pm
<div style='font: 9pt Arial; text-align: left; '>It's over, G-Man. You've lost.</div>

 #46322  by G-man Joe
 Wed Aug 08, 2001 1:10 pm
<div style='font: 11pt "comic sans MS"; text-align: left; '>*snicker* Okay, Ebert.</div>

 #46328  by S.Cody2
 Wed Aug 08, 2001 2:49 pm
<div style='font: 14pt Plakatbau; text-align: left; '>Wait, what's this? The Fag-o-meter is off the scale as well!</div>

 #46329  by SineSwiper
 Wed Aug 08, 2001 7:44 pm
<div style='font: 11pt "EngraversGothic BT", "Copperplate Gothic Light"; text-align: left; '>Well, you're the closest person to it.</div>

 #46338  by S.Cody2
 Thu Aug 09, 2001 4:27 am
<div style='font: 14pt Plakatbau; text-align: left; '>...And it went off right after BL replied. Jeez, Sine, lay off the "PLURing", I think you're becoming retarded for real.</div>

 #46351  by SineSwiper
 Thu Aug 09, 2001 8:31 pm
<div style='font: 11pt "EngraversGothic BT", "Copperplate Gothic Light"; text-align: left; '>Doesn't matter. The Fag-o-meter doesn't work at far distances. Instead, it just picks up the closest fag in its range.</div>
 #46356  by S.Cody2
 Fri Aug 10, 2001 1:21 am
<div style='font: 14pt Plakatbau; text-align: left; '>Oh, by the way, Black Lotus' rating is now being easily eclipsed from a target in <b>your</b> direction. I wonder if you guess who it is.</div>

 #46357  by Ganath
 Fri Aug 10, 2001 1:57 am
<div style='font: 12pt ; text-align: left; '>Here, let me spell out what Sine's saying. "S-C-O-D-Y I-S A F-A-G", make more sense now? :)</div>

 #46360  by S.Cody2
 Fri Aug 10, 2001 5:43 am
<div style='font: 14pt Plakatbau; text-align: left; '>No shit, Helping Wonder Pup! Sine's inability to understand the principles of a simple gag like the 'Fag-o-meter' and temporal placement is the real allstar here. You're not that dumb, are you?</div>

 #46361  by SineSwiper
 Fri Aug 10, 2001 7:48 am
<div style='font: 11pt "EngraversGothic BT", "Copperplate Gothic Light"; text-align: left; '>I'm sorry if you're too stupid to see a counterattack when it comes to you.</div>

 #46365  by Kupek
 Fri Aug 10, 2001 9:07 am
<div style='font: 10pt Verdana, Tahoma; text-align: left; padding: 0% 10% 0% 10%; '>God, I love the internet.</div>

 #46368  by S.Cody2
 Fri Aug 10, 2001 12:29 pm
<div style='font: 14pt Plakatbau; text-align: left; '>I eagerly concur!</div>

 #46369  by G-man Joe
 Fri Aug 10, 2001 12:44 pm
<div style='font: 11pt "comic sans MS"; text-align: left; '>I conquer!</div>

 #46370  by Torgo
 Fri Aug 10, 2001 1:19 pm
<div style='font: 9pt Arial; text-align: left; '>Why stop now? Let's see how far can this thread go.</div>

 #46371  by Torgo
 Fri Aug 10, 2001 1:21 pm
<div style='font: 9pt Arial; text-align: left; '>"...thread can go..."</div>