The Other Worlds Shrine

Your place for discussion about RPGs, gaming, music, movies, anime, computers, sports, and any other stuff we care to talk about... 

  • "Kurdish leaders enraged by 'undemocratic' American plan to occupy Iraq"

  • Somehow, we still tolerate each other. Eventually this will be the only forum left.
Somehow, we still tolerate each other. Eventually this will be the only forum left.
 #5026  by Julius Seeker
 Wed Feb 19, 2003 7:45 pm
<div style='font: 12pt ; text-align: left; '><b>Link:</b> <a href="http://news.independent.co.uk/world/pol ... =379060</a>

Kurdish leaders enraged by 'undemocratic' American plan to occupy Iraq
By Patrick Cockburn in Arbil, northern Iraq
17 February 2003


The US is abandoning plans to introduce democracy in Iraq after a war to overthrow Saddam Hussein, according to Kurdish leaders who recently met American officials.

The Kurds say the decision resulted from pressure from US allies in the Middle East who fear a war will lead to radical political change in the region.

The Kurdish leaders are enraged by an American plan to occupy Iraq but largely retain the government in Baghdad. The only changes would be the replacement of President Saddam and his lieutenants with senior US military officers.

It undercuts the argument by George Bush and Tony Blair that war is justified by the evil nature of the regime in Baghdad.

"Conquerors always call themselves liberators," said Sami Abdul-Rahman, deputy prime minister of the Kurdish administration, in a reference to Mr Bush's speech last week in which he said US troops were going to liberate Iraq.

Mr Abdul-Rahman said the US had reneged on earlier promises to promote democratic change in Iraq. "It is very disappointing," he said. "In every Iraqi ministry they are just going to remove one or two officials and replace them with American military officers."

Kurdish officials strongly believe the new US policy is the result of pressure from regional powers, notably Saudi Arabia and Turkey.

The US appears to be quietly abandoning earlier declarations that it would make Iraq a model democracy in the Middle East. In Iraq, free elections would lead to revolutionary change because although the Shia Muslims and Kurds constitute three-quarters of the population, they are excluded from power in Baghdad by the Sunni Muslim establishment.

Kurdish leaders are deeply alarmed by US intentions, which only became clear at a meeting in Ankara earlier in the month and from recent public declarations by US officials. Hoshyar Zebari, a veteran Kurdish leader, said: "If the US wants to impose its own government, regardless of the ethnic and religious composition of Iraq, there is going to be a backlash."

Mr Abdul-Rahman accuses the US of planning cosmetic changes in Iraq. "This is to give the government on a platter to the second line of Ba'athists [the ruling party]," he said.

The US appears to be returning to the policy it pursued at the end of the Gulf War in 1991. It did seek to get rid of President Saddambut wanted to avoid a radical change in Iraq. The US did not support the uprisings of Shia Muslims and Kurdsbecause it feared a transformation in Iraqi politics that might have destabilised its allies in the Middle East or benefited Iran.

The two Kurdish parties ­ the Kurdistan Democratic Party (KDP), which rules western Kurdistan, and the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan ­ are at the heart of the Iraqi opposition. Together they rule four million people in an area the size of Switzerland that has been outside President Saddam's control since 1991.

The change in American policy means marginalising the Iraqi opposition which has been seeking to unite. In response to the US decision, the Kurds and their allies have accelerated moves to hold a conference of opposition parties in Salahudin, the headquarters of the KDP, now scheduled for tomorrow. "We want to know if we are partners in regime change or not," Mr Zebari said.

He spoke scathingly of any attempt by America "to bring in an Iraqi from the United States who has not seen his country for years and impose him by armed force".

The destabilising impact of the impending war is already being felt in the mountains of northern Iraq. Turkey has demanded that its troops be allowed to take over a swath of territory along the border inside Iraq. The ostensible reason is to prevent a flood of Kurdish refugees trying to flee into Turkey, but the Kurdish parties say they are quite capable of doing this themselves. They say the Turkish demand, to which they suspect the US has agreed in return for the use of Turkish military facilities, is the first step in a Turkish plan to advance into Iraqi Kurdistan.

The Kurds fear that a US-led war against President Saddam might be the occasion for a Turkish effort to end the de facto independence enjoyed by Iraqi Kurds for more than a decade. One Kurdish leader said: "Turkey has made up its mind that it will intervene in northern Iraq in order to destroy us.

• Peace activists who want to be "human shields" arrived in Baghdad yesterday. The activists, who had 18 Britons among them, left London on 25 January in three double decker buses. They will deploy at likely bombing targets.</div>

 #5028  by ManaMan
 Wed Feb 19, 2003 8:34 pm
<div style='font: 12pt Arial; text-align: left; '>Uhhh.... Does this really come as a big surprise? I mean, Bush isn't invading Iraq with the intention of liberating anything but Iraq's oil reserves and as far as Democracy is concerned weellll..... You all saw the 2000 election.</div>

 #5030  by SineSwiper
 Wed Feb 19, 2003 8:40 pm
<div style='font: 11pt "EngraversGothic BT", "Copperplate Gothic Light"; text-align: left; '>What election? It was a forceful entry of office.</div>

 #5036  by VicRattlehead
 Thu Feb 20, 2003 1:38 am
<div style='font: 9pt ; text-align: left; '>you know what......... fuck the middle east.... let em starve..... im hammered enough to say that... they dont want us therre...then fuck em.... no more billions in aid........seriously...that money could be better spenty elsewhere</div>

 #5039  by Ganath
 Thu Feb 20, 2003 3:10 am
<div style='font: 9pt ; text-align: left; '>That would first require some humanity, decency, and sense amongst the cabinet.</div>

 #5040  by Ganath
 Thu Feb 20, 2003 3:11 am
<div style='font: 9pt ; text-align: left; '>That would first require some humanity, decency, and sense amongst the cabinet and presidency.</div>

 #5044  by Kupek
 Thu Feb 20, 2003 9:30 am
<div style='font: 10pt verdana; text-align: left; padding: 0% 10% 0% 10%; '>I don't know about Canada, but the US does not spend "billions in aid." Back in 1996, it was less than 1% of the federal budget, and I'd be surprised if it's any more now.</div>

 #5048  by G-man Joe
 Thu Feb 20, 2003 10:56 am
<div style='font: 11pt "Fine Hand"; text-align: left; '>Yeah, Leave the Pol-Pot and Husseins alone! =8^P Let the liberals go there and protest instead.</div>

 #5064  by Eric
 Thu Feb 20, 2003 7:19 pm
<div style='font: 11pt ; text-align: left; '>Yeah! Fuck the East! WEST SIDE!</div>